Wolves manager Gary O’Neil expressed his frustration with the implementation of VAR in the Premier League after his team’s 3-2 stoppage-time defeat against Fulham on Monday. O’Neil went as far as to claim that VAR has cost his team “seven points” this season. His discontent stems from several crucial decisions made by VAR in their matches this season, which he believes have had a significant impact on their league position.
The match against Fulham saw three penalties awarded, two of which favored their opponents. The first penalty was given for a challenge by Wolves’ Nélson Semedo on Tom Cairney. O’Neil lamented that the referee was not sent to the screen to review the decision and believed that it could have been overturned based on the evidence available. In addition to this, a late challenge by João Gomes on Harry Wilson was reviewed by VAR and ultimately resulted in another penalty for Fulham.
O’Neil highlighted that there have been other instances this season where VAR decisions have gone against his team. Three specific incidents were mentioned, including a missed foul by Manchester United’s André Onana in their opening match, and two penalties awarded to Newcastle United and Sheffield United, respectively. The penalty given to Sheffield United was particularly frustrating as it came in the 10th minute of stoppage time, handing them a victory.
Perhaps the most concerning aspect for Wolves is that the Premier League’s Independent Key Match Incidents Panel has admitted that these decisions were errors. The panel, responsible for reviewing VAR decisions, acknowledged that Wolves were on the receiving end of incorrect rulings on three occasions this season. These mistakes undoubtedly raise questions about the accuracy and consistency of VAR.
Currently sitting in 12th place with 15 points from 13 games, Wolves’ manager firmly believes that “bad refereeing decisions” have cost them numerous points this season. O’Neil went on to claim that these decisions have influenced their league position, potentially resulting in a difference of up to seven points.
He expressed concern about the impact these decisions may have on his reputation as a new manager at a big club. The difference between 15 and 22 points, in his opinion, is irreparable and could hinder his efforts to establish himself in his role. O’Neil’s frustration with VAR stems from the belief that it is not providing the desired assistance with subjective decisions, ultimately adding an additional layer of controversy to the game.
Wolves manager Gary O’Neil’s criticism of VAR in the Premier League reflects an increasing frustration shared by many managers, players, and fans. The on-field controversies resulting from VAR decisions have become a regular topic of discussion, with the impact on team standings becoming profound. As the debate around VAR continues, the authorities must address the issues raised to ensure fair and consistent officiating in the world’s most-watched football league.
Leave a Reply