Team USA’s flaws were glaringly exposed in their recent 110-104 loss to Lithuania in the FIBA World Cup. Despite a valiant effort from players like Anthony Edwards and Mikal Bridges, the Americans were outplayed for the majority of the game. Lithuania showcased a sensational performance, taking advantage of Team USA’s weaknesses and executing their game plan flawlessly. While some factors, such as officiating, may have played a role, it cannot overshadow Lithuania’s impressive showing.
One of the key factors in Lithuania’s victory was their balanced roster. Nine different Lithuanian players made 3-pointers, demonstrating their shooting prowess. Additionally, six players had at least three rebounds, highlighting their dominance on the boards. The team also exhibited great teamwork, with six players dishing out at least two assists. The scoring was evenly distributed, with five players reaching double figures. The entire Lithuanian roster deserves credit for the win, as they worked together to exploit Team USA’s weaknesses.
Team USA is aware of their size disadvantage in international basketball. The best big men in the world are often from outside the US, particularly from Europe. This has led to discussions of potentially recruiting players like Joel Embiid, who became an American citizen last year. However, size remains a major limitation for Team USA. Lithuania, on the other hand, boasts a roster with several players standing at 6-foot-9 and taller, including current and former NBA players. This size advantage played a significant role in Lithuania’s dominant rebounding performance, where they outmatched Team USA 43-27. Jaren Jackson Jr., the lone big man for the Americans, struggled with fouls and failed to make a significant impact.
Lithuania formulated a game plan that effectively exploited Team USA’s lack of size, focusing on dominating the boards. The Lithuanians came into the game leading the World Cup in team rebounding and capitalized on this strength. Meanwhile, the US struggled to secure rebounds, giving Lithuania numerous second-chance opportunities. Their relentless effort on the offensive glass proved to be a significant factor in the outcome of the game.
Lithuania entered the game with a deep bench and a proficient 3-point shooting team. They capitalized on their strength by making their first nine 3-point attempts, frustrating Team USA’s defense. The US attempted to double team Lithuania’s big men, but this only left shooters wide open on the perimeter. The Lithuanians also attacked size advantages in the post, scoring efficiently and drawing fouls. Overall, Lithuania showcased their depth and shooting prowess, putting immense pressure on Team USA.
The loss to Lithuania may have dented Team USA’s momentum and confidence, but the immediate consequences are not severe. The team had already secured a place in the medal round and guaranteed a spot in the 2024 Paris Olympics. In their upcoming matchup against Italy, the Americans will have a chance to bounce back. While Lithuania’s size advantage may not be present in future opponents, Team USA must regroup and refine their strategies to regain their rhythm and confidence.
Team USA’s defeat against Lithuania exposed their flaws and limitations. Lithuania’s superior size, rebounding dominance, and efficient shooting were key factors in their victory. Team USA must address their lack of size and find ways to counter opponents with a size advantage. Despite this setback, the Americans still have a chance to compete for the title in the FIBA World Cup. The loss serves as a wake-up call and an opportunity for Team USA to reassess their strategies and make adjustments moving forward.
Leave a Reply